Candidates' positions are categorized as Pro (Yes), Con (No), Not Clearly Pro or Con, or None Found. Candidates who have changed their positions are listed as Now their most recent position.
Should Malibu and Santa Monica Schools Have Separate School Districts?
"To determine the impact of separation on SMMUSD and Santa Monica we are currently looking into hiring a consultant to work with the District’s Financial Oversight Committee (FOC).
The key financial questions revolve around unraveling the voter approved indebtedness of bonds and parcel taxes. A key question to answer is will Santa Monica end up with less resources to implement its educational program? Also, assuming Malibu becomes a basic aid district will they be able to sustain a separate district? Also, recent environmental concerns in Malibu will require an environmental analysis of the impact of separation involving the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). Furthermore, there will be issues with staffing patterns and teachers in Malibu can have bumping rights if they choose to stay within the Santa Monica Unified School District. Lastly, we need to determine the distribution of real assets such as equipment, property etc. If it is determined that the impact on Santa Monica is positive and the voters in Malibu approve the separation, then I believe this proposal will receive more interest in Santa Monica. Regardless of the outcome, I will continue to do my part in providing collaborative leadership and ensuring that residents in both communities are treated with dignity and respect." Oct. 1, 2014 Oscar de Ia Torre
"I have been in this district for 30+ years. I have watched this district go from school starting at 9:00 am and Letting out at 2:15 pm with no before or after school programs, no art, no music, and the consideration of selling off school sites to where it is today.
The families of Malibu up to this year have been donating to the PTA which has been shared with the whole district, but at the same time, the city council (SM) has contributed $52.5 million or there abouts each year. I think that they need each other to support the kinds of programs that they have today.
I do think the new board NEEDS to be aware of Malibu and BE THERE, but I don’t think to divide the district is a healthy move, though both Malibu and Santa Monica city officials talk about it." Patty Finer
"Two independent school districts are best for the children of both communities. $2 million of money from Santa Monica is currently spent in Malibu. Those scarce resources would return home to Santa Monica! At the same time, Malibu would become a basic aid district and would operate with ~$2.6 million more than it currently receives. In addition, the current Santa Monica-Malibu school district could not be formed today. Geographically unconnected districts were made illegal in 1980 because they don't work very well. Each independent community has its own potentially very different sets of wants, needs and challenges. SMMUSD is the last geographically unconnected school district in California. Those different wants, needs, and challenges are made even harder to jointly resolve here because of the huge difference in the populations of the two cities. Santa Monica has 84% of the voters and therefore dominates the politics of the district. Historically, Malibu has had only one school board member out of seven. There has not even been one Malibu school board member elected since 2004. Independent districts would receive more focused leadership and have more money with which to teach their children, all without a penny of new taxes. It's a clear winner!" Oct. 1, 2014 Craig Foster
"Yes, if it is financially, legally and educationally viable.
A number of Malibu residents have expressed their desire to have their own Malibu school district. Supporters point to frustration with lack of representation on the School Board, a geographic divide, the fact that Malibu is its own City and should have its own school district, and policy differences.
I support exploration of separation. There are important legal, financial, educational and organizational questions which must be answered, however, and 'due diligence' will be complex. Separation must be a sound proposition for both districts -- leaving the remaining SMUSD whole and creating a new MUSD which will be able to stand on its own financially and provide high quality programs to Malibu students. While separation is explored, it is vital that the Santa Monica and Malibu parts of the district work together cooperatively and collaboratively in ensuring the best education for all of our children. The SMMUSD offers a very strong educational program for all students, whether they attend schools in Santa Monica or Malibu. We must work together to maintain and improve all schools as we explore separation." Oct. 1, 2014 Laurie Lieberman
"One reason for separating is that Malibu and Santa Monica are quite different from each other and have different needs.
On the other hand, just as complementary or differing viewpoints can enrich a discussion, a school district is enriched when its jurisdiction encompasses two dissimilar communities.
Nevertheless, it is true that there is tension between some stakeholders in Malibu and the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District. Toxins found in some schools in Malibu, disagreements over lighting a football field, a preference for decentralized fundraising, and not currently having a board member who resides in Malibu are among the reasons for this tension.
However, SMMUSD cannot divide itself into two school districts without resolving several financial and legal issues.
While it seems that the current board is considering eventual unification, I am hoping the tensions will dissipate after the new board takes over and that the district will remain intact." Oct. 1, 2014 Dhun May
"I understand the frustration that Malibu has about being tied to a larger district. Most meetings are in Santa Monica, and few teachers, administrators or Boardmembers live in Malibu.
The goal is to ensure that each district will have the capacity to be able to provide the same breadth and depth of programs for its students as provided now and to have the ability to operate and maintain the school facilities.
We need to have an in-depth discussion prior to moving this forward to the County and State Boards of Education.
Key issues to resolve are continuation of payments of outstanding capital improvement bonds, the continuation of the existing parcel tax, the distribution of SMMUSD assets between the new districts, employee issues, future bonding capacity and above all, the impact on student achievement." Oct. 1, 2014 Ralph Mechur
"I believe strongly that before the District can move forward with the process of separation, legal and financial viability questions, and concerns of continued educational excellence for every student, must be satisfactorily researched and answered. Then and only then, and if the people of Malibu still desire to do so, should we move forward, together, to separate into two districts. I do believe that the process should move forward in a timely manner. This does not mean that I think this will be easy or simple." Oct. 1, 2014 Richard Tahvildaran-Jesswein